11787 Federalist No. 55
2The Total Number
3of the House of Representatives
4From the New York Packet.
5Friday, February 15, 1788.
6HAMILTON OR MADISON
7To the People of the State of New York:
8THE number of which the House of Representatives
9 is to consist,
10 forms another and a very interesting point of view,
11 under which this branch of the federal legislature
12 may be contemplated.
13Scarce any article, indeed, in the whole Constitution
14 seems to be rendered more worthy of attention,
15 by the weight of character
16 and the apparent force of argument
17 with which it has been assailed.
18The charges exhibited against it are,
19 first, that so small a number of representatives
20 will be an unsafe depositary
21 of the public interests;
22 secondly, that they will not possess
23 a proper knowledge of the local circumstances
24 of their numerous constituents;
25 thirdly, that they will be taken
26 from that class of citizens
27 which will sympathize least
28 with the feelings of the mass of the people,
29 and be most likely to aim
30 at a permanent elevation of the few
31 on the depression of the many;
32 fourthly, that defective as the number will be
33 in the first instance,
34 it will be more and more disproportionate,
35 by the increase of the people,
36 and the obstacles which will prevent
37 a correspondent increase of the representatives.
38In general it may be remarked on this subject,
39 that no political problem
40 is less susceptible of a precise solution
41 than that which relates to the number
42 most convenient for a representative legislature;
43 nor is there any point
44 on which the policy of the several States
45 is more at variance,
46 whether we compare their legislative assemblies
47 directly with each other,
48 or consider the proportions
49 which they respectively bear
50 to the number of their constituents.
51Passing over the difference
52 between the smallest and largest States,
53 as Delaware,
54 whose most numerous branch
55 consists of twenty-one representatives,
56 and Massachusetts,
57 where it amounts to between three and four hundred,
58 a very considerable difference is observable
59 among States nearly equal in population.
60The number of representatives in Pennsylvania
61 is not more than one fifth
62 of that in the State last mentioned.
63New York, whose population is to that of South Carolina
64 as six to five,
65 has little more than one third
66 of the number of representatives.
67As great a disparity prevails
68 between the States of Georgia and Delaware
69 or Rhode Island.
70In Pennsylvania, the representatives
71 do not bear a greater proportion to their constituents
72 than of one for every four or five thousand.
73In Rhode Island,
74 they bear a proportion of at least one
75 for every thousand.
76And according to the constitution of Georgia,
77 the proportion may be carried
78 to one to every ten electors;
79 and must unavoidably far exceed the proportion
80 in any of the other States.
81Another general remark to be made is,
82 that the ratio between the representatives
83 and the people
84 ought not to be the same
85 where the latter are very numerous
86 as where they are very few.
87Were the representatives in Virginia
88 to be regulated by the standard in Rhode Island,
89 they would, at this time,
90 amount to between four and five hundred;
91 and twenty or thirty years hence, to a thousand.
92On the other hand, the ratio of Pennsylvania,
93 if applied to the State of Delaware,
94 would reduce the representative assembly
95 of the latter to seven or eight members.
96Nothing can be more fallacious
97 than to found our political calculations
98 on arithmetical principles.
99Sixty or seventy men
100 may be more properly trusted
101 with a given degree of power than six or seven.
102But it does not follow
103 that six or seven hundred
104 would be proportionably a better depositary.
105And if we carry on the supposition
106 to six or seven thousand,
107 the whole reasoning ought to be reversed.
108The truth is,
109 that in all cases a certain number at least
110 seems to be necessary
111 to secure the benefits of free consultation
112 and discussion,
113 and to guard against too easy a combination
114 for improper purposes;
115 as, on the other hand,
116 the number ought at most
117 to be kept within a certain limit,
118 in order to avoid the confusion and intemperance
119 of a multitude.
120In all very numerous assemblies,
121 of whatever character composed,
122 passion never fails to wrest the sceptre from reason.
123Had every Athenian citizen been a Socrates,
124 every Athenian assembly would still have been a mob.
125It is necessary also to recollect here
126 the observations which were applied
127 to the case of biennial elections.
128For the same reason
129 that the limited powers of the Congress,
130 and the control of the State legislatures,
131 justify less frequent elections
132 than the public safely might otherwise require,
133 the members of the Congress need be less numerous
134 than if they possessed
135 the whole power of legislation,
136 and were under no other
137 than the ordinary restraints
138 of other legislative bodies.
139With these general ideas in our mind,
140 let us weigh the objections
141 which have been stated
142 against the number of members proposed
143 for the House of Representatives.
144It is said, in the first place,
145 that so small a number
146 cannot be safely trusted with so much power.
147The number of which this branch of the legislature
148 is to consist, at the outset of the government,
149 will be sixtyfive.
150Within three years a census is to be taken,
151 when the number may be augmented
152 to one for every thirty thousand inhabitants;
153 and within every successive period of ten years
154 the census is to be renewed,
155 and augmentations may continue to be made
156 under the above limitation.
157It will not be thought an extravagant conjecture
158 that the first census will,
159 at the rate of one for every thirty thousand,
160 raise the number of representatives
161 to at least one hundred.
162Estimating the negroes in the proportion of three fifths,
163 it can scarcely be doubted
164 that the population of the United States
165 will by that time, if it does not already,
166 amount to three millions.
167At the expiration of twenty-five years,
168 according to the computed rate of increase,
169 the number of representatives
170 will amount to two hundred,
171 and of fifty years, to four hundred.
172This is a number which, I presume,
173 will put an end to all fears
174 arising from the smallness of the body.
175I take for granted here what I shall,
176 in answering the fourth objection, hereafter show,
177 that the number of representatives
178 will be augmented from time to time
179 in the manner provided by the Constitution.
180On a contrary supposition,
181 I should admit the objection
182 to have very great weight indeed.
183The true question to be decided then is,
184 whether the smallness of the number,
185 as a temporary regulation,
186 be dangerous to the public liberty?
187Whether sixty-five members for a few years,
188 and a hundred or two hundred for a few more,
189 be a safe depositary
190 for a limited and well-guarded power
191 of legislating for the United States?
192I must own that I could not give a negative answer
193 to this question,
194 without first obliterating every impression
195 which I have received
196 with regard to the present genius
197 of the people of America,
198 the spirit which actuates the State legislatures,
199 and the principles which are incorporated
200 with the political character
201 of every class of citizens
202I am unable to conceive
203 that the people of America, in their present temper,
204 or under any circumstances
205 which can speedily happen,
206 will choose, and every second year
207 repeat the choice of,
208 sixty-five or a hundred men
209 who would be disposed to form and pursue
210 a scheme of tyranny or treachery.
211I am unable to conceive
212 that the State legislatures,
213 which must feel so many motives to watch,
214 and which possess so many means of counteracting,
215 the federal legislature,
216 would fail either to detect or to defeat
217 a conspiracy of the latter
218 against the liberties of their common constituents.
219I am equally unable to conceive
220 that there are at this time,
221 or can be in any short time,
222 in the United States,
223 any sixty-five or a hundred men
224 capable of recommending themselves
225 to the choice of the people at large,
226 who would either desire or dare,
227 within the short space of two years,
228 to betray the solemn trust committed to them.
229What change of circumstances, time,
230 and a fuller population of our country may produce,
231 requires a prophetic spirit to declare,
232 which makes no part of my pretensions.
233But judging from the circumstances now before us,
234 and from the probable state of them
235 within a moderate period of time,
236 I must pronounce
237 that the liberties of America cannot be unsafe
238 in the number of hands
239 proposed by the federal Constitution.
240From what quarter can the danger proceed?
241Are we afraid of foreign gold?
242If foreign gold could so easily corrupt
243 our federal rulers
244 and enable them to ensnare and betray
245 their constituents,
246 how has it happened
247 that we are at this time
248 a free and independent nation?
249The Congress which conducted us through the Revolution
250 was a less numerous body than their successors will be;
251 they were not chosen by, nor responsible to,
252 their fellowcitizens at large;
253 though appointed from year to year,
254 and recallable at pleasure,
255 they were generally continued for three years,
256 and prior to the ratification
257 of the federal articles,
258 for a still longer term.
259They held their consultations
260 always under the veil of secrecy;
261 they had the sole transaction of our affairs
262 with foreign nations;
263 through the whole course of the war
264 they had the fate of their country
265 more in their hands
266 than it is to be hoped will ever be the case
267 with our future representatives;
268 and from the greatness of the prize at stake,
269 and the eagerness of the party which lost it,
270 it may well be supposed
271 that the use of other means than force
272 would not have been scrupled.
273Yet we know by happy experience
274 that the public trust was not betrayed;
275 nor has the purity of our public councils
276 in this particular ever suffered,
277 even from the whispers of calumny.
278Is the danger apprehended
279 from the other branches of the federal government?
280But where are the means to be found
281 by the President, or the Senate, or both?
282Their emoluments of office, it is to be presumed,
283 will not, and without a previous corruption
284 of the House of Representatives cannot,
285 more than suffice for very different purposes;
286 their private fortunes,
287 as they must allbe American citizens,
288 cannot possibly be sources of danger.
289The only means, then, which they can possess,
290 will be in the dispensation of appointments.
291Is it here that suspicion rests her charge?
292Sometimes we are told
293 that this fund of corruption is to be exhausted
294 by the President in subduing
295 the virtue of the Senate.
296Now, the fidelity of the other House
297 is to be the victim.
298The improbability of such a mercenary
299 and perfidious combination
300 of the several members of government,
301 standing on as different foundations
302 as republican principles will well admit,
303 and at the same time accountable
304 to the society over which they are placed,
305 ought alone to quiet this apprehension.
306But, fortunately, the Constitution
307 has provided a still further safeguard.
308The members of the Congress are rendered ineligible
309 to any civil offices that may be created,
310 or of which the emoluments may be increased,
311 during the term of their election.
312No offices therefore can be dealt out
313 to the existing members
314 but such as may become vacant
315 by ordinary casualties:
316 and to suppose that these would be sufficient
317 to purchase the guardians of the people,
318 selected by the people themselves,
319 is to renounce every rule
320 by which events ought to be calculated,
321 and to substitute an indiscriminate
322 and unbounded jealousy,
323 with which all reasoning must be vain.
324The sincere friends of liberty,
325 who give themselves up to the extravagancies
326 of this passion,
327 are not aware of the injury they do their own cause.
328As there is a degree of depravity in mankind
329 which requires a certain degree
330 of circumspection and distrust,
331 so there are other qualities in human nature
332 which justify a certain portion
333 of esteem and confidence.
334Republican government presupposes the existence
335 of these qualities in a higher degree
336 than any other form.
337Were the pictures which have been drawn
338 by the political jealousy of some among us
339 faithful likenesses of the human character,
340 the inference would be,
341 that there is not sufficient virtue among men
342 for self-government;
343 and that nothing less than the chains of despotism
344 can restrain them from destroying
345 and devouring one another.
346PUBLIUS.