11787 Federalist No. 35
2The Same Subject Continued
3Concerning the General Power of Taxation
4For the Independent Journal.
5HAMILTON
6To the People of the State of New York:
7BEFORE we proceed to examine any other objections
8 to an indefinite power of taxation in the Union,
9 I shall make one general remark;
10 which is, that if the jurisdiction
11 of the national government,
12 in the article of revenue,
13 should be restricted to particular objects,
14 it would naturally occasion an undue proportion
15 of the public burdens to fall upon those objects.
16Two evils would spring from this source:
17 the oppression of particular branches of industry;
18 and an unequal distribution of the taxes,
19 as well among the several States
20 as among the citizens of the same State.
21Suppose, as has been contended for,
22 the federal power of taxation
23 were to be confined to duties on imports,
24 it is evident that the government,
25 for want of being able to command other resources,
26 would frequently be tempted
27 to extend these duties to an injurious excess.
28There are persons who imagine
29 that they can never be carried to too great a length;
30 since the higher they are,
31 the more it is alleged they will tend
32 to discourage an extravagant consumption,
33 to produce a favorable balance of trade,
34 and to promote domestic manufactures.
35But all extremes are pernicious in various ways.
36Exorbitant duties on imported articles
37 would beget a general spirit of smuggling;
38 which is always prejudicial to the fair trader,
39 and eventually to the revenue itself:
40 they tend to render other classes of the community
41 tributary, in an improper degree,
42 to the manufacturing classes,
43 to whom they give a premature monopoly
44 of the markets;
45 they sometimes force industry
46 out of its more natural channels
47 into others in which it flows
48 with less advantage;
49 and in the last place, they oppress the merchant,
50 who is often obliged to pay them himself
51 without any retribution from the consumer.
52When the demand is equal
53 to the quantity of goods at market,
54 the consumer generally pays the duty;
55 but when the markets happen to be overstocked,
56 a great proportion falls upon the merchant,
57 and sometimes not only exhausts his profits,
58 but breaks in upon his capital.
59I am apt to think that a division of the duty,
60 between the seller and the buyer,
61 more often happens than is commonly imagined.
62It is not always possible
63 to raise the price of a commodity
64 in exact proportion
65 to every additional imposition laid upon it.
66The merchant,
67 especially in a country of small commercial capital,
68 is often under a necessity of keeping prices down
69 in order to a more expeditious sale.
70The maxim that the consumer is the payer,
71 is so much oftener true
72 than the reverse of the proposition,
73 that it is far more equitable
74 that the duties on imports should go
75 into a common stock,
76 than that they should redound
77 to the exclusive benefit
78 of the importing States.
79But it is not so generally true
80 as to render it equitable,
81 that those duties should form
82 the only national fund.
83When they are paid by the merchant
84 they operate as an additional tax
85 upon the importing State,
86 whose citizens pay their proportion of them
87 in the character of consumers.
88In this view they are productive of inequality
89 among the States;
90 which inequality would be increased
91 with the increased extent of the duties.
92The confinement of the national revenues
93 to this species of imposts
94 would be attended with inequality,
95 from a different cause,
96 between the manufacturing
97 and the non-manufacturing States.
98The States which can go farthest
99 towards the supply of their own wants,
100 by their own manufactures,
101 will not, according to their numbers or wealth,
102 consume so great a proportion of imported articles
103 as those States
104 which are not in the same favorable situation.
105They would not, therefore, in this mode alone
106 contribute to the public treasury
107 in a ratio to their abilities.
108To make them do this it is necessary
109 that recourse be had to excises,
110 the proper objects of which
111 are particular kinds of manufactures.
112New York is more deeply interested
113 in these considerations
114 than such of her citizens
115 as contend for limiting the power of the Union
116 to external taxation may be aware of.
117New York is an importing State,
118 and is not likely speedily to be,
119 to any great extent, a manufacturing State.
120She would, of course, suffer in a double light
121 from restraining the jurisdiction of the Union
122 to commercial imposts.
123So far as these observations tend to inculcate
124 a danger of the import duties
125 being extended to an injurious extreme
126 it may be observed,
127 conformably to a remark made
128 in another part of these papers,
129 that the interest of the revenue itself
130 would be a sufficient guard
131 against such an extreme.
132I readily admit that this would be the case,
133 as long as other resources were open;
134 but if the avenues to them were closed,
135 HOPE, stimulated by necessity,
136 would beget experiments,
137 fortified by rigorous precautions
138 and additional penalties,
139 which, for a time,
140 would have the intended effect,
141 till there had been leisure
142 to contrive expedients
143 to elude these new precautions.
144The first success would be apt
145 to inspire false opinions,
146 which it might require a long course
147 of subsequent experience to correct.
148Necessity, especially in politics,
149 often occasions false hopes, false reasonings,
150 and a system of measures
151 correspondingly erroneous.
152But even if this supposed excess should not be
153 a consequence of the limitation
154 of the federal power of taxation,
155 the inequalities spoken of would still ensue,
156 though not in the same degree,
157 from the other causes that have been noticed.
158Let us now return to the examination of objections.
159One which, if we may judge
160 from the frequency of its repetition,
161 seems most to be relied on, is,
162 that the House of Representatives
163 is not sufficiently numerous
164 for the reception of all the different classes
165 of citizens,
166 in order to combine the interests and feelings
167 of every part of the community,
168 and to produce a due sympathy
169 between the representative body
170 and its constituents.
171This argument presents itself
172 under a very specious and seducing form;
173 and is well calculated to lay hold
174 of the prejudices of those
175 to whom it is addressed.
176But when we come to dissect it with attention,
177 it will appear to be made up of nothing
178 but fair-sounding words.
179The object it seems to aim at is,
180 in the first place, impracticable,
181 and in the sense in which it is contended for,
182 is unnecessary.
183I reserve for another place the discussion
184 of the question which relates
185 to the sufficiency of the representative body
186 in respect to numbers,
187 and shall content myself with examining here
188 the particular use
189 which has been made of a contrary supposition,
190 in reference to the immediate subject
191 of our inquiries.
192The idea of an actual representation
193 of all classes of the people,
194 by persons of each class,
195 is altogether visionary.
196Unless it were expressly provided
197 in the Constitution,
198 that each different occupation
199 should send one or more members,
200 the thing would never take place in practice.
201Mechanics and manufacturers will always be inclined,
202 with few exceptions,
203 to give their votes to merchants,
204 in preference to persons
205 of their own professions or trades.
206Those discerning citizens are well aware
207 that the mechanic and manufacturing arts
208 furnish the materials
209 of mercantile enterprise and industry.
210Many of them, indeed,
211 are immediately connected
212 with the operations of commerce.
213They know that the merchant
214 is their natural patron and friend;
215 and they are aware,
216 that however great the confidence
217 they may justly feel
218 in their own good sense,
219 their interests can be more effectually promoted
220 by the merchant than by themselves.
221They are sensible that their habits in life
222 have not been such as to give them
223 those acquired endowments,
224 without which, in a deliberative assembly,
225 the greatest natural abilities
226 are for the most part useless;
227 and that the influence and weight,
228 and superior acquirements of the merchants
229 render them more equal to a contest
230 with any spirit
231 which might happen to infuse itself
232 into the public councils,
233 unfriendly to the manufacturing
234 and trading interests.
235These considerations,
236 and many others that might be mentioned prove,
237 and experience confirms it,
238 that artisans and manufacturers
239 will commonly be disposed
240 to bestow their votes upon merchants
241 and those whom they recommend.
242We must therefore consider merchants
243 as the natural representatives
244 of all these classes of the community.
245With regard to the learned professions,
246 little need be observed;
247 they truly form no distinct interest in society,
248 and according to their situation and talents,
249 will be indiscriminately the objects
250 of the confidence and choice of each other,
251 and of other parts of the community.
252Nothing remains but the landed interest;
253 and this, in a political view,
254 and particularly in relation to taxes,
255 I take to be perfectly united,
256 from the wealthiest landlord
257 down to the poorest tenant.
258No tax can be laid on land
259 which will not affect the proprietor
260 of millions of acres
261 as well as the proprietor of a single acre.
262Every landholder will therefore have a common interest
263 to keep the taxes on land as low as possible;
264 and common interest may always be reckoned upon
265 as the surest bond of sympathy.
266But if we even could suppose a distinction of interest
267 between the opulent landholder
268 and the middling farmer,
269 what reason is there to conclude,
270 that the first would stand a better chance
271 of being deputed to the national legislature
272 than the last?
273If we take fact as our guide,
274 and look into our own senate and assembly,
275 we shall find that moderate proprietors of land
276 prevail in both;
277 nor is this less the case in the senate,
278 which consists of a smaller number,
279 than in the assembly,
280 which is composed of a greater number.
281Where the qualifications of the electors are the same,
282 whether they have to choose
283 a small or a large number,
284 their votes will fall upon those
285 in whom they have most confidence;
286 whether these happen to be men of large fortunes,
287 or of moderate property,
288 or of no property at all.
289It is said to be necessary,
290 that all classes of citizens should have
291 some of their own number
292 in the representative body,
293 in order that their feelings and interests
294 may be the better understood and attended to.
295But we have seen that this will never happen
296 under any arrangement
297 that leaves the votes of the people free.
298Where this is the case,
299 the representative body,
300 with too few exceptions
301 to have any influence
302 on the spirit of the government,
303 will be composed of landholders, merchants,
304 and men of the learned professions.
305But where is the danger
306 that the interests and feelings
307 of the different classes of citizens
308 will not be understood or attended to
309 by these three descriptions of men?
310Will not the landholder know and feel
311 whatever will promote or insure
312 the interest of landed property?
313And will he not, from his own interest
314 in that species of property,
315 be sufficiently prone to resist every attempt
316 to prejudice or encumber it?
317Will not the merchant understand
318 and be disposed to cultivate,
319 as far as may be proper,
320 the interests of the mechanic
321 and manufacturing arts,
322 to which his commerce is so nearly allied?
323Will not the man of the learned profession,
324 who will feel a neutrality
325 to the rivalships
326 between the different branches of industry,
327 be likely to prove an impartial arbiter
328 between them,
329 ready to promote either,
330 so far as it shall appear to him
331 conducive to the general interests
332 of the society?
333If we take into the account
334 the momentary humors or dispositions
335 which may happen to prevail
336 in particular parts of the society,
337 and to which a wise administration
338 will never be inattentive,
339 is the man whose situation leads
340 to extensive inquiry and information
341 less likely to be a competent judge
342 of their nature, extent, and foundation
343 than one whose observation
344 does not travel beyond the circle
345 of his neighbors and acquaintances?
346Is it not natural
347 that a man who is a candidate
348 for the favor of the people,
349 and who is dependent on the suffrages
350 of his fellow-citizens
351 for the continuance of his public honors,
352 should take care to inform himself
353 of their dispositions and inclinations,
354 and should be willing to allow them
355 their proper degree of influence
356 upon his conduct?
357This dependence,
358 and the necessity of being bound himself,
359 and his posterity,
360 by the laws to which he gives his assent,
361 are the true, and they are the strong chords
362 of sympathy
363 between the representative and the constituent.
364There is no part of the administration of government
365 that requires extensive information
366 and a thorough knowledge
367 of the principles of political economy,
368 so much as the business of taxation.
369The man who understands those principles best
370 will be least likely to resort
371 to oppressive expedients,
372 or sacrifice any particular class of citizens
373 to the procurement of revenue.
374It might be demonstrated
375 that the most productive system of finance
376 will always be the least burdensome.
377There can be no doubt
378 that in order to a judicious exercise
379 of the power of taxation,
380 it is necessary that the person
381 in whose hands it should be acquainted
382 with the general genius, habits,
383 and modes of thinking of the people at large,
384 and with the resources of the country.
385And this is all that can be reasonably meant
386 by a knowledge of the interests and feelings
387 of the people.
388In any other sense the proposition
389 has either no meaning, or an absurd one.
390And in that sense let every considerate citizen
391 judge for himself
392 where the requisite qualification
393 is most likely to be found.
394PUBLIUS.